 |
| The fluorescent bunny |
Through the growing interest in nature and bio-genetics, artists have moved into the laboratory where they begun to work side-by-side with all sorts of scientists such as biologists, neuroscientists, nanotechnologists, and more. This raised a lot of controversy, however, as new implications regarding ethics and foreign innovative ideas started to come about. Two key figures in the field of bio art are important in regards to its uprise: Joe Davis and Eduardo Katz. Joe Davis is considered to be the actually pioneer for bio art. He is the one who first produced the idea of modifying genes and molecular structures to insert them in other living species. He produced works such as the audio microscope and the circuit clock. However, it is Eduardo Katz who later develops what is considered the most iconic piece of bio art: the fluorescent bunny. This concerned the separation of the fluorescent protein, acquara Victoria, from the fluorescent jellyfish, and injecting it into a fertilized rabbit egg cell. Ultimately, this produced a glowing bunny, which he named Alba. This formed a lot of controversy over the fact that one is utilizing something that is ‘natural’ to produce something ‘artificial’. Another example of this matter involves Marta Dimiezas’ work, in which she modified the wing patterns of live butterflies, changing the molecular cell structures; but later, the wings ended up having holes in them, causing fright amongst the people.
 |
| Rat anatomy can be used to solve human health complications |
Despite all of the debate, other projects have been produced for the purpose of increasing human health for the general public. For instance, Kathy High believes that rats should be used and be genetically engineered so that scientists can gain further understanding on human health. These modified organisms are called transgenic rats, and they are also known as hybrids, and even cyborgs.
 |
| "Creativity breeds creativity" |
As more and more individuals move into the field of biology (more specifically, bio art), the increased participation creates more creativity, and continues on as more information about the subject gets passed on - "creativity breeds creativity". The Human Genome Project, for example, did just that. Now, there are thousands of books spread across in libraries regarding this topic, and the numbers are still increasing till this day.
Sources:
Kelty, Christopher M. “Outlaw, Hackers, Victorian Amateurs: Diagnosing Public Participation in the Life Sciences Today.” Journal of Science Communication, vol. 09, no. 01, 2010, doi:10.22323/2.09010303.
Lovejoy, Margot, et al. Context Providers: Conditions of Meaning in Media Arts. Intellect, 2011.
Vesna, Victoria. “5 Bioart pt1 1280x720.” YouTube, YouTube, 18 Sept. 2013, www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaThVnA1kyg.
Vesna, Victoria. “5 BioArt pt3.” YouTube, YouTube, 17 May 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL9DBF43664EAC8BC7&v=3EpD3np1S2g.
Vesna, Victoria. “5 BioArt pt4.” YouTube, YouTube, 17 May 2012, www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL9DBF43664EAC8BC7&v=2qSc72u9KhI.